How to break the biochemical and nuclear world crisis

俄再次將核武升至高度警戒, 中國也應提高核武警戒等級 音頻 作者：聖勞倫斯河評論
俄烏戰爭: 難免走向世界大戰 甚至可能走向核戰 音頻 作者：聖勞倫斯河評論
新的大戰已經爆發，中國離最終勝利，只差這一步 作者：戎評
舊世界的格局，被普京敲碎了幾個角 作者：遠方青木
疫情防控的成就和後面的緊迫形勢 音頻 作者：goofegg
北約集團的羊圈理論和世界和平的想法 音頻 作者：goofegg English
世界和平的想法的延申 音頻 作者：goofegg English
俄烏戰後世界格局的幻想 音頻 作者：goofegg
本文音頻
It is creepy to read the first two articles linked above. If the worst-case scenario is true, China will face a great crisis. If the current global pandemic was caused by the United States, the war would have already begun. China should do more to help speed up the disintegration of SWIFT and dollar financial hegemony systems, but first of all, we should address the risks facing our own epidemic prevention policies mentioned in 5.
As for the nuclear war mentioned in the first two chapters, how to solve this crisis is slightly mentioned in the next three chapters.
It was just an illusion that it could be realized slowly after the war, but time is running out. With the potential risk of escalation of the Russia-Ukraine war, China and Russia should communicate and discuss in-depth and eliminate the danger of nuclear war in a timely manner.
I supposed  Xi dada and Putin can talk everything , right? Including the vexation of Russia's plunder of vast amounts of land from China. This is something that must be talked about if there is ever to be a complete friendship between Russia and China. The purpose of China's talks is not to reclaim the lost land, but to pray for lasting peace between China and Russia for generations to come, and for the harmonious coexistence of the two peoples. 6, 7 articles mentioned above controversial land as condominium development zone between the two countries will become more bright and prosperous place, between the two countries as the ties between the two countries, can let two people get along, maybe it's just a beautiful vision, although was quickly can let Russia out of economic dilemma, for the two peoples is good thing, However, Putin is worried that China's infiltration could turn into a situation similar to eastern Ukraine. It doesn't matter if we don't implement it now, but the nuclear strategic security mutual trust between China and Russia mentioned in the article can be discussed and implemented on the table now.
Nuclear war, the sword of Damocles hanging over the head of mankind, is the common concern of mankind. What is terrible is that a massive and uncontrollable nuclear counterattack will inevitably lead to global suffering and the ensuing nuclear winter. The surviving human beings who have survived the long nuclear winter are bound to face the disruption of all the global industrial chains and the total reconstruction. At that time, in order to survive the difficult days, it is difficult for the technology industry to recover to the pre-nuclear level. The mutation caused by nuclear radiation residue, epidemic let human misery linger.
The world must have a convention to punish the first country and leader of the nuclear war, so that they face the unbearable weight: the first country to initiate a nuclear war is the public enemy of the world, will face the full division of the country, the leader of the nuclear war will be lured for various organizations bounty hunting; For the country that launches a nuclear war, the world does not have to make a nuclear counterattack, but after waiting for a nuclear explosion, the country faces a global siege and crusade.
I suppose the originators of both tactical and strategic use of nuclear weapons would consider the consequences of a full-scale attack and the break-up of the country?
Then the latter strategy is easy to implement: China and Russia sign treaty never to attack each other with nuclear weapons, China and India, China and France, Russia and India, Russia and France etc... Any conflict or war the countries of Eurasia will not use nuclear weapons on their own Eurasian continent.
Such a treaty is not a military alliance, but to reduce the nuclear danger. There could also be such a treaty between China and the United States, and between Russia and the United States. I think this would help reduce the global fear of nuclear crisis?
The earth has now entered a highly civilized era, and we should work together for the development of human civilization and open up new living space. If there is any more indiscriminate bombing and invasion of other countries, it should be met with global indignation, condemnation and even crusade. If big countries form alliances across shores, inciting their followers to cause trouble or even setting dogs on people for the sake of their bloodthirsty nature of capital, and artificially creating tension, someone must be in charge, and the United Nations should let it play a real role. Now the United Nations headquarters is in the United States. The United States often arbitrarily denies visas to foreign diplomats for its own selfish ends and obstructs the United Nations' efforts to maintain justice. It should consider the relocation of the United Nations headquarters.
If Putin, or future leaders, open their minds and abandon their guard and cooperate with China to form a joint government and turn it into a development zone, this must be one of the safest places in the world protected by the two great powers and the United Nations headquarters could be considered for relocation here.
The United Nations headquarters, either on the world's most safety, either on the world's most dangerous place, the most dangerous place is the Israeli and Palestinian dispute of land, here also is pretty good selection, hope that the UN can really play its role, it is time for a tragic Palestinian people no longer bullying days.
For the current global pandemic of COVID-19, we must continue to dig deep into its root cause. If it is true that the US deliberately spread the virus, it must be punished. China, Russia and other countries around the world must play their role in making the US suffer the consequences of provoking wars and spreading the virus everywhere.

Translated from：如何破局生化和核武器世界危機

• [06/18] How to break the biochemical and nuclear world crisis
• [06/21]如何看待莫言和賈平凹
• [06/24]為什麼我書讀得越多，越看不起周圍的人？
• [06/26]怎麼學習寫現代詩？
• [06/28]我翻譯的兩首英文小詩
• [06/29]USTC畢業季丨敢於超越攀高峰 奮勇爭先綻芳華
• [06/29]作為一個高中生，我寫的詩怎麼樣？
• [07/04]為什麼吳亦凡、劉鑫這些人還有些粉絲？
• [01/27]昏評現在的垃圾派和下半身派詩歌
• [01/29]作協和詩刊的盛宴及資本的狂歡
• [01/29]毒教材的處理建議和教育導向的問題
• [02/26]中國的道路選擇和未來戰略布局
• [03/08]那些貪官和恨國黨啊，哎。。。

• 查看：[goofegg的.最新博文]
• 查看：[大家的.最新博文]
• 查看：[大家的.熱點雜談]