昨天出版的《紐約時報》爆出了有關「德國客機失事前有一名飛行員被鎖在了駕駛艙外」的驚濤駭浪的蹊蹺內情。
此篇名為Germanwings Pilot Was Locked Out of Cockpit Before Crash in France 的長文開篇便問: 在相對晴朗的天氣里，為何一架載有150人的飛機會突然墜毀，極難解釋。答案抑或是「一名飛行員在飛機墜落前離開了駕駛艙，並且一直未能回到艙內」。
巴黎官員中的一名參與調查的軍方高級官員昨日周三稱，在從巴塞羅那到杜塞爾多夫的這段行程的早期，飛行員之間的對話「非常流暢，非常冷靜」。然而後來的音頻顯示，其中一名飛行員離開了駕駛艙，一直沒有回來。這些蹊蹺內情出自調查了駕駛艙內的一部語音記錄儀后的結果。
這篇由署名NICOLA CLARK and DAN BILEFSKYMARCH的報道稱，「外面的人輕輕地敲了門，但沒人應答，」這名調查人員說。「然後，他又用更大的力氣敲門，還是沒人回應。一直沒人回應。」
他說，「你可以聽出，他當時試圖把門撞開。」
這段音頻應該說反映出了墜機前的部分情形，但任然似乎有些許待解釋的疑問。
「我們仍然不知道其中一名飛行員出駕駛艙的原因，」一名官員說。由於調查仍在進行當中，他要求不具名。「但可以肯定的是，在飛行終結的時刻，另一名飛行員是獨自一人在駕駛艙內，而且沒有去開艙門。」
他說，「你可以聽出，他當時試圖把門撞開。」
這段音頻應該說反映出了墜機前的部分情形，但任然似乎有些許待解釋的疑問。
「我們仍然不知道其中一名飛行員出駕駛艙的原因，」一名官員說。由於調查仍在進行當中，他要求不具名。「但可以肯定的是，在飛行終結的時刻，另一名飛行員是獨自一人在駕駛艙內，而且沒有去開艙門。」
另外， NYTimes 的相關報導還刊發了圖解德國客機墜毀事故等頗有信息力度的文章。
全部作者的其他最新日誌
發表評論 評論 (11 個評論)
突發病？
- 回復 ryu
- 延伸閱讀: The data from the voice recorder seems only to deepen the mystery surrounding the crash and provides no indication of the condition or activity of the pilot who remained in the cockpit. The descent from 38,000 feet over about 10 minutes was alarming but still gradual enough to indicate that the twin-engine Airbus A320 had not been damaged catastrophically . At no point during the descent was there any communication from the cockpit to air traffic controllers or any other signal of an emergency.
When the plane plowed into craggy mountains northeast of Nice, it was traveling with enough speed that it was all but pulverized, killing the 144 passengers and crew of six and leaving behind almost no apparent clues about what caused the crash.
The French aviation authorities have made public very little, officially, about the nature of the information that has been recovered from the audio recording, and it was not clear whether it was partial or complete. France』s Bureau of Investigations and Analyses confirmed only that human voices and other cockpit sounds had been detected and would be subjected to detailed analysis.
- 回復 ryu
- 「I don't like it,」 said the French official, who cautioned that his initial analysis was based on the very limited information currently available.
「So far, we don't have any evidence that points clearly to a technical explanation,」 the official said.
- 回復 ryu
- The French aviation authorities have made public very little, officially, about the nature of the information that 「到目前為止，我們並沒有明確指向技術上的何證據，」這位官員說。「因此，我們必須考慮人為故意的責任的可能性。」
caro: 什麼可能都有。
- 回復 caro
- 嗯，這個占的比例更大。
ryu: The French aviation authorities have made public very little, officially, about the nature of the information that 「到目前為止，我們並沒有明確指向技
