反歧視部門的那個婦女也不受理我的投訴了

3/11

反歧視部門的那個婦女也不受理我的投訴了

今天她給我回信說，我投訴Li Xu Li的事與性騷擾無關，是單純的academic affairs，所以她不管了。令我失望。

以下是我剛給她寫的回信：

There is a discrimination component. There are about ten students in that class. She gave extensions of assignments to a few students, but not to the others. She said she did not give me extension because I did not ask her.

Typically there were six or seven students sitting in the classroom at the begining of any of her classes. Starting from the beginning of October most assignments on the myopenmath.com passed the due dates before she taught the subject. I and a few students talked about this before class. 

On a day between 10/10 to 10/20, at beginning of a class while about seven students sitting in the classroom, two or three students spoke to her about the assignments became expired before she taught. And then she made some vague announcement. While they were talking I was there. Not every student but only two or three students were talking to her about the assignments expiration before she taught.

In this February I met two students of that class. It turns out three students of that class whom spoke to her at that class, all of their assignments had approriate due dates. It was not that the due dates expired and they had to ask for extension, but all assignments had reasonable original due dates, from the mid October to the end of the semester.  They had time to complete those assignments without the need to ask for.

From the begining of October most of the assignments on my account page appeared expired before she taught. I could not score on them. While those three students of that class never had this problem.

Those students received this secrete deal tended not to spread the words. They didn't actively reveal this to me, so I was unaware, and I assumed their assignments were the same as mine that basically all the assignments were displayed as expired before she taught.

Li says she gave extensions to those students because they asked her for, and she did not give me extension because I did not ask for. This is not true. In a same classroom while I was sitting among those students, they spoke to Li while I didn't speak. This is considered the students actually speaking already represented me. Li gave extensions to those three students, but she is supposed to gave all the students the same extension. This is her discrimination among students.