FREE SPEECH IN AMERICA
AND ITS CONSEQUENCES
A POLITICAL VIEW
by Roger & Danqi (January 9,2011)
The shooting on Saturday January 8th in Tucson,
Arizona highlights the potential political and societal fallout from
irresponsible free speech. The shooting killed at least 5 persons ( including a
Federal Judge and a 9 year old child ) and critically wounded many others –
including the intended target U.S. Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords. The
Congresswoman was shot in the head from less than 2 feet away, in a public
place.
While the motive of the gunman is still unknown it is known
that he has written and posted views and complained about the government and
certain policies.
While we as Americans value our Constitutionally protected
rights to free speech that right also implies a certain responsibility in its
use. The misuse of free speech can come very close to going over the line and
in effect incite violence or public mahem.
The political pundits who come through out televisions every
night or through our radio』s during the day incite much of this as well as the
highly partisan and toxic political discourse that now envelopes the nation.
A case in point is Sarah Palin ( former Vice Presidential
candidate ). Her Political Action Committee made 「targets」 of those Democrats
they wished to defeat in the 2010 mid term elections. Her marketing literally
showed those officials with 「cross hairs」 of a rifle scope over them to 「take
them out」… the implication of shooting them ( otherwise, why use the gun
imagery ) is there. Now, of course I certainly don』t think Sarah Palin espoused
or would ever condone such behavior or actions but it did, without a doubt,
incite her followers and increase the tension of the moment.
Or how about Sharron Angle who was campaigning to replace
U.S. Senator Harry Reid of Nevada. During an interview she implied if she lost
the election and her followers didn』t like the result that there were 「second
amendment remedies」 for that. The implication is that disgruntled voters could
hide behind the second amendment to the Constitution ( which is the right to
keep and bear arms ) to effect change on elected leaders, essentially an armed
rebellion to overthrow the elected government.
What about the large group of people who continue to believe
that President Obama is a Muslim and follower of Islam? But, another group
opposed to the President takes delight that he went to a Christian church for
over 20 years led by a militant African American ( Rev. Wright )? You can』t
have it both ways – he』s either Christian or a Muslim. But, the point is that
both groups are vehemently opposed to the President and spread vicious vitriol
to their groups that is nothing more than misinformation and intended to 「stir
the pot」. The goal is discredit the President even though the two groups
against Obama hold views that conflict and cancel each other out. Like so much
of the information encouraged by these media types truth is not the point,
stirring the pot and inciting and exciting and building hatred and a political
viewpoint against the political opposition is the point. It doesn』t matter to
them if the 「truth」 they broadcast is actually just a lie. They have used free
speech in its most insidious manner – they broadcast lies that lead to dividing
the people and make friends become enemies and eventually someone will use
violence to pursue political views even though their actions are based on a
「false」 truth – a lie.
Free speech, while highly valued and protected, has to come
with responsibilities that are considered a value to the society as well. While
the vast majority of people will never and would never act out in a violent
manner the problem is that it only takes one person with a gun to shock the
political system – and destroy the lives of many.
The existing level of toxicity in political and media
language hurts us not only domestically but internationally as well. Our
current animosity in Washington D.C. has brought us another Congress that will
be unable to move the country forward and continues to divide the people. A
fractious population and divided country is weaker for it.
The United States has been admired and looked to by
generations of people here and all around the world as a model for freedom and
prosperity, fairness and justice, civility and adherence to the law. The
current level of communication between the political parties has eroded these
tenets and hurt our nation.
I lay the blame for this erosion squarely at the feet and
doorsteps of those political officials who encourage misinformation and the
media types ( Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Keith Olberman, Glen Beck , etc )
who spread and disseminate the information and turn citizen against citizen,
make enemies of the population between the political groups and use the
airwaves and printed word to spread the virus that now infects this country.
Perhaps the shooting in Tucson and the loss of life can help
bring about a more focused look on the current state of political discourse.
Perhaps the partisan politicians and the extreme media shows will tone down the
level of hatred they spew from their micophones and newspapers. Perhaps we』ll
all just step back for a moment and reflect on what free speech is and how to
use it in a responsible manner that encourages growth in political
communication rather than violence amongst the citizenry.
I doubt that any of the above will actually happen in the
long run. It』s just too much fun and politically valuable to separate the
people and make them enemies of each other and much to profitable for the media
to maintain the status quo.