下载APP | 繁體版 | 发布广告 |常用工具

特朗普谴责Charlottesville暴力事件中多方责任，错了吗？

作者：wjbf  于 2017-8-20 02:37 发表于 最热闹的华人社交网络--贝壳村

作者分类:财经万花筒|通用分类:热点杂谈|已有18评论

特朗普在Charlottesville暴力事件后一度谴责多方责任("Many sides")。在后续的新闻发布会上继续指责左右两方对暴力事件都有责任，并称极右游行人群中也有很多好人("many fine people")。特朗普的言论招致巨大反弹，共和党资深人士也纷纷出来谴责，企业高管对特朗普唯恐避之不及，导致两个企业高管组成的政策顾问团全部解散。

特朗普的多方责任论错了吗？错了！而且大错特错！作为国家元首，这种错误不可饶恕！

首先美国高度保护言论自由，即使仇恨言论，包括背离宪法人人平等的种族主义言论，均有合法宣泄权利。这一权利是美国传统，基本没人叫板。在今年早期和特朗普奋力抗衡，维护移民权利的American Civil Liberties Union（美国民权联盟）组织也有维护白人至上主义者说话权力的政策（最近决定对持枪游行者不予声援）。因此Charlottesville 事件于侵犯言论自由无关。任何相反的说法都是混淆视听。同时值得强调，言论自由的权利不等于行动上的权利。歧视行为是非法的，不受法律保护。

回放 Charlottesville暴力事件，一些白人种族主义者决定在8月12日举行游行，参加者包括三K党，新纳粹等等。这一行动招致反歧视民权主义者的反游行。如果其间发生拳脚冲突，令人遗憾，但不会惊动朝野和世界。如果对拳脚冲突特朗普也发表多方责任论，就过于小题大做，很多人会耸耸肩，因为特朗普满嘴跑火车已经是常态，但不会招致如此强烈反弹。但这次暴力事件不止于此，而是十分严重的暴力事件。一个种族主义者开车闯入抗议人群，刻意碾压路人，多人受伤，一人罹难。这种行径完全是恐怖主义行径，与欧洲发生的ISIS暴力事件没有什么本质不同。唯一不同是一个是外来妖孽，一个是本土妖孽。

因此Charlottesville暴力事件是个恐怖袭击事件，不是拳脚冲突事件。如同任何恐怖袭击事件，这里没有多方责任，只有一方责任，那就是这个恐怖主义罪犯和推动他行动的思潮。如果有人胆敢说 ISIS 驾车碾压平民的恐怖主义者只是多方责任人的一方，如果有人胆敢说拥抱 ISIS信念的人有很多好人，这样的人恐怕会被唾骂的口水淹死。特朗普在Charlottesville暴力事件中扮演的角色就是这样的人，而且更糟糕的是，他贵为美国总统，代表美国联邦政府！

如果有人认为美国本土极端主义者的恐怖威胁不大，那你就错了，就在8月14日，Charlottesville暴力事件两天后，Oklahoma 逮捕一个企图炸银行的本土恐怖分子（Man arrested in plot to blow up Oklahoma City bank）。美国媒体对外来和本土的恐怖主义报道非常有取舍，导致民众忽视本土恐怖主义的危害性。

综上，特朗普犯下如下大错
  •     完全忽视事件的恐怖主义特征，令反恐斗争染上严重种族倾向色彩
  •     混淆言论自由和道义正确，没有和仇恨言论划清界限
  •     甚至为仇恨言论寻求借口


作者：藿香子
时间：2017年8月19日
(版权所有，欢迎转载，请注明出处) 

高兴
感动
同情
1

搞笑
难过
拍砖
3

支持
7

鲜花

刚表态过的朋友 (11 人)

收藏 分享邀请 举报

发表评论 评论 (18 个评论)

16 回复 舌尖上的世界 2017-8-20 05:14
老年痴呆的早期症状，嘴没把门的了，心里有什么就往外吐噜什么，种族主义者的老底儿根本瞒不住。接下来会是上下各个门都要把不住，咱们等着瞧吧。
16 回复 长河明月 2017-8-20 05:51
川普从来没打算做全体美国人民的总统。
15 回复 light12 2017-8-20 06:47
美国许多在全球化失去工作的人支持川普。面对一个撕裂的美国没有简单解决办法。https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
11 回复 wjbf 2017-8-20 07:40
light12: 美国许多在全球化失去工作的人支持川普。面对一个撕裂的美国没有简单解决办法。https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
的确如此，这个时候更怕有一个挑动群众斗群众的总统。
14 回复 light12 2017-8-20 07:45
wjbf: 的确如此，这个时候更怕有一个挑动群众斗群众的总统。
http://www.backchina.com/blog/260533/article-263423.html
20 回复 qxw66 2017-8-20 08:01
是的。但是白左更错。
16 回复 wjbf 2017-8-20 08:06
qxw66: 是的。但是白左更错。
你是说ISIS恐怖分子有错，但是美军反恐伤及平民更错吗？
16 回复 qxw66 2017-8-20 08:12
wjbf: 你是说ISIS恐怖分子有错，但是美军反恐伤及平民更错吗？
那不仅仅叫错了！
16 回复 SecondThought 2017-8-20 09:00
Most people on both sides were peaceful protesters. However there were mobs on both sides. The Nazi flag was disturbing to Americans. The hammer and sickle flag should also be alarming to us. The brutal communism is not any better than Nazism. Antifa is also a mob organization. You can not say that Antifa is more peaceful than the Neo-Nazi just because Antifa did not make the killing this time. It is reported that there will be an anti-Muslim rally in Quebec city soon and Antifa will be up there to pick up the fight. Also the number of BLM hatred groups has reached all time high to 200 as of last year. Should you blame only one side or "many sides"?
15 回复 wjbf 2017-8-20 09:51
SecondThought: Most people on both sides were peaceful protesters. However there were mobs on both sides. The Nazi flag was disturbing to Americans. The hammer and s
We are talking about Charlottesville event, not some abstract, theoretical event. There is no ambiguity in Charlottesville event, period.
18 回复 SecondThought 2017-8-20 10:03
"wjbf": "We are talking about Charlottesville event, not some abstract, theoretical event. There is no ambiguity in Charlottesville event, period."

I was talking about the Charlottesville. Antifa was there, not for the peaceful counter-protest but with the violent actions. Antifa is basically a left-side mob group that deploys violent actions against the right-side protesters anywhere.
13 回复 loneshepherd 2017-8-20 10:12
小默多克致[21世纪福斯]同僚的信
上周我们在夏洛特维尔看到的事情和美国总统就此的反应，每一个美国人以及关心自由的人都应该关注。

这些事提醒我们，为什么对仇恨和偏执的警惕是一种长期的职责 - 是为保障我们的生活方式的一种必须的戒律。当我们看到夏洛特维尔的大街上 人们气势汹汹地挥舞着字旗、那个种族主义暴徒野蛮地实施暴力和恐怖的时候，仇恨被赤裸裸地展现出来。无法相信我要写下这样的东西：反对纳粹责无旁贷，不存在“好的纳粹”、不存在“好的三K党”、不存在“好的恐怖分子”！民主党也好、共和党也好、非民主非共和也好，大家都必须同意这一点，对这种行为不能有一丝一毫的妥协！
15 回复 wjbf 2017-8-20 10:15
SecondThought: "wjbf": "We are talking about Charlottesville event, not some abstract, theoretical event. There is no ambiguity in Charlottesville eve
Did anyone from Antifa conduct terrorism attack? You either didn't read my article or didn't comprehend what I articulated.
15 回复 SecondThought 2017-8-20 11:06
wibf: Did anyone from Antifa conduct terrorism attack? You either didn't read my article or didn't comprehend what I articulated.

The tragic death in the Charlottesville event was caused by the escalation of the violent actions by the both sides but not the plotted Islamic 恐怖主义 as we have been seeing in Europe and U.S. No one denied that Antifa was involved in the violent actions. What the media hinted was that Antifa was not violent enough to cause the killing. The logic in your writing is incorrect. In most of the so-called terrorism events, the terrorists killed peaceful people. Those people did not even know that the danger was coming. In the Charlottesville event, the alt-left was well prepared to pick up the fight. They were prepared for the danger. Could anyone be killed if there was no violent counter protesters? In short, most terrorisms had only one side but this one had the two sides. The unfortunate thing was that a counter protester was killed because the emotion got out of control when the fight was escalating.
15 回复 SecondThought 2017-8-20 11:16
wibf: Did anyone from Antifa conduct terrorism attack? You either didn't read my article or didn't comprehend what I articulated.

Let's to make two simple hypothetical examples. You were watching Boston Marathon. Someone put a bomb beside you and you were killed. You were purely a victim and the guy who put the bomb beside you was fully responsible for the terrorism event. The second example is that someone was protesting in Charlottesville and you also went there with a prepared violent action against the other protester. It happened that you were killed when the other could not control his emotion. did you have any responsibility in the tragic event?
15 回复 rfw1972 2017-8-20 15:36
萎缩国移被白垃圾打死活该
13 回复 wjbf 2017-8-20 20:14
SecondThought: wibf: Did anyone from Antifa conduct terrorism attack? You either didn't read my article or didn't comprehend what I articulated.

Let's to make two s
你这个比喻和女人被强奸有很大原因是女人太性感招摇异曲同工啊，强奸犯"could not control his emotion"。我想对此世界已有公论，没必要讨论了。
14 回复 看得开 2017-8-21 10:01
长河明月: 川普从来没打算做全体美国人民的总统。
老贼本意是当暴君（tyrant)。

facelist doodle 涂鸦板

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

wjbf最受欢迎的博文
  1. 杭州G20剑拔弩张，中国打响第一枪 [2016/09]
  2. 中国居民储蓄率到底有多高？55%的家庭基本为零 [2016/10]
  3. 谎言无底线：评“沙特要抛售7500亿美债” [2016/09]
  4. 王健林要政府限制国人海外消费（外汇管制来临？） [2016/08]
  5. 前瞻2017：中国再次走到十字路口 [2017/01]
  6. 简评：美国何去何从？ [2017/02]
  7. 中国先声夺人，中美冲突大戏帷幕拉开 [2016/12]
  8. 中国从俄国进口原油有多贵？ [2017/05]
  9. 综述：美国未来堪忧 [2017/02]
  10. 经济学家要取缔纸币，你银行的存款也要越来越少 [2016/09]
  11. 资本从逐利到欺诈：看一家美国高科技公司的兴衰 [2016/10]
  12. 中国在十字路口误入歧途 [2018/08]
  13. 川普(Trump)的4%经济增长计划是画饼充饥 [2016/09]
  14. 贸易逆差不是中美贸易冲突的真正根源 [2018/05]
  15. 中国8月份“经济企稳向好”靠的是楼市 [2016/09]
  16. 从奥巴马医改看政客的欺骗性和民智的局限性 [2017/03]
  17. 美国税改再度显示民智的局限性 [2017/05]
  18. 特朗普谴责Charlottesville暴力事件中多方责任，错了吗？ [2017/08]
  19. 特朗普向墨西哥征收20%关税，葫芦里卖的什么药？ [2017/01]
  20. 美国税改何去何从？ [2017/02]
  21. 川普让独立学者也疯狂，不可思议！！！ [2016/10]
  22. 特朗普已经放弃4%经济增长的竞选许诺 [2017/03]
  23. 美国就业问题和政府有什么关系？ [2017/04]
其它[热点杂谈]博文更多

关于本站 | 隐私政策 | 免责条款 | 版权声明 | 联络我们 | 刊登广告 | 转手机版 | APP下载

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外华人中文门户：倍可亲 (http://www.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系统基于 Discuz! X3.1 商业版 优化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc. 更新：GMT+8, 2024-3-23 19:30

倍可亲服务器位于美国圣何塞、西雅图和达拉斯顶级数据中心，为更好服务全球网友特统一使用京港台时间

返回顶部