花妙的東西是作秀

學理科的人看問題，分析問題，思考問題，很完整  The science students look at the problem, analyze the problem, think about the problem, they are very complete
花妙的東西那是作秀  Beautiful things are for show
你看馬雲的阿里巴巴倉庫是這麼有條不紊的設計.如沒有一個好的數學頭腦和系統化的概念，那是根本沒法建成的.衛星系統如沒有精確的設計，高度,速度,角度，衛星脫離軌道只要一點點，對方天線就捕捉不到通訊波，怎麼連成空天通訊網啊？治理國家最基本的是深埋於骨子裡的構架，也是需要這樣的科學安排呀.我覺得你們的全隊，真地需要像我這樣的人來給你們補充,擴大,完整知識面，平衡你們看問題的角度.不然你們這樣團隊做決定是要出偏差的呀！比如，不給我和Jackie應該的報酬。嘿嘿，舉個例子,據說男生喜歡左邊的，女生喜歡右邊的.不見得，我可以很明明白白地說，國外的男孩子基本上都是喜歡左邊的. 右邊的女孩子，像奶茶妹妹那樣的，只有中國的劉強東和一些北歐男人他們會喜歡.如對女孩子選擇觀都這樣不同，更何況文科理科看世界不同呢，是不是？ 再舉一個例子，上次獅城辯論里有一個題目「溫飽和道德」. 我看一幫文科生，唇槍舌劍，談古論今，旁徵博引，滔滔不絕，講個半天，無論是支持還是反對，都講了一些似是而非的論點.如果換作我們理科生，換我去說，那個什麼，出辯論題的人有一點混淆概念. 溫飽是個人的生理層次需要，道德是社會人的精神層次要求.社會常態下，這兩者沒有交集,不能比較.特殊情況下，有可能為了溫飽而失去道德，也有可能為了道德而為溫飽受苦，對和錯，那要看社會提供的生存條件下各個具體的人如何作為，要具體情況具體分析，再看帶來的總體效果. 親愛的主席，88，你看我們學理科的看問題，分析問題，思考問題，是不是很完整。我們不會拿起題目來就講.那些文科生所講的旁證博引，談古論今，都只是些具體情況具體分析的例子，是在一個框架里挑選的個別的點，卻沒有提到整個的框架.理科生卻不然，我們先搞清楚事情的來龍去脈和上下高低，我們知道這些概念應該放在什麼位置，我們一出手就直擊要害。花妙的東西那是作秀，來哄騙88這樣的人的.哈哈哈哈  親愛的主席，88，你們是不是覺得，如果在你們團隊中加入我，那不是一件壞事？我會給你們帶來不一樣的思維？不同尋常的創意？不一樣的搞怪浪漫效果？收了我吧，求求你們了！

You see Jack Ma』s Alibaba warehouse is so methodically designed. Without a good mathematical mind and a systematic concept, it cannot be built at all. If the satellite system does not have an accurate design, altitude, speed, angle,  as long as the orbit is a little bit off, satellite separation causes the communication wave not be captured by the other party's antenna. The most basic thing in governing the country is the framework buried deep in the bones. It also requires such a scientific arrangement. I think that your team really needs someone like me to supplement, expand, and complete your knowledge and balance your viewing angle of the problem. Otherwise, you and your team will make a mistake when making a decision! For example, don't pay me and Jackie what we deserve. Hey, for example, it is said that boys like the left and girls like the right. Not necessarily, I can say very clearly that foreign boys basically like the left. The girls on the right, like Sister Zhang Zetian, only China』s Liu Qiangdong and some Nordic men will like it. If  views of girls choice are so different, not to mention that the liberal arts sciences look at the world differently, don』t they? As another example, in the last Lion City debate, there was a topic "Food and Clothing , Morality." I saw a group of liberal arts students who talked about the past and present, talked about the topic, talked about for a long time, whether it was support or opposition, They all talked about some plausible arguments. If they were replaced by our science students, let me say, the person who has the debate question is a little confusing. Food and clothing is the individual's physical level needs, and morality is the social person's spiritual level requirements. Under normal circumstances, the two do not intersect and cannot be compared. Under special circumstances, it is possible to lose morality for food and clothing, or to suffer for food and clothing for morality. Right and wrong, it depends on the specific conditions of life provided by society. How do people act, we need to analyze the specific situation and then look at the overall effect. Dear Chairman, 88, you see when we science students look at problems, analyze problems, and think about problems, are we complete? We will not just pick up the topic to talk about. Those liberal arts students mentioned the side quotes, talking about the ancient and modern, are just examples of specific analysis of specific situations, selected individual points in a frame, but did not mention The whole framework. Science students are not, we first figure out the ins and outs of things and the high and low levels, we know where these concepts should be placed, we hit the key as soon as we shot. The beautiful things are for show, to trick people like 88. Hahahaha Dear Chairman, 88, do you think that if you join me in your team, that is not a bad thing? I will bring you different thinking? Unusual creativity? Funny romantic effect? Take me, please!