王銘銘，北京大學人類學教授。2004年，一博士研究生指控他剽竊William A.
Haviland的著作《文化人類學》的幾部分。北京大學隨後解除了他大部分學術職
位。
Chronicle of Higher Education, From the issue dated May 19, 2006
Plagued by Plagiarism
An endemic problem in Chinese higher education is, ironically, fueled
by pressure to raise standards
By PAUL MOONEY
Beijing
Fang Shi-min, a molecular biologist, freelance writer, and
self-appointed plagiarism buster, was poring over the online
curriculum vitae of the new assistant dean of Tsinghua University's
medical school last year after receiving an anonymous tip that the
document included false information. He became suspicious when he
noticed that one of the research papers it listed was about the
molecular biology of HIV ― a subject not related to the dean's
specialty, which was surgery. Mr. Fang did a bit of research and
discovered that the paper had actually been written by a Chinese
scientist in the United States with the same family name and first
initial as Liu Hui, the new assistant dean.
Mr. Fang posted his discovery ― and his doubts about Mr. Liu's work
experience ― on his popular Web site, New Threads, which is dedicated
to exposing academic corruption in China. Several months later, the
university quietly dismissed Mr. Liu.
The incident is the latest in a series of high-profile cases of
academic corruption that have embarrassed universities around China ―
a trend that experts say is hurting the quality of higher education
and threatening much-needed reforms of the nation's ailing university
system.
Cheating is not new to China, but critics of the way the government is
trying to modernize the country's higher-education system say these
efforts are only exacerbating the problem.
The gravity of the issue was highlighted in March, when more than 100
top scholars signed an open letter urging the government to fight
academic corruption. Their plea was widely reported in the Chinese
news media. That same month, China Newsweek,a prominent magazine (not
related to the American newsweekly), ran a 12-page cover story, "The
Abnormal Corruption of Higher Education," in which it described dozens
of cases of plagiarism, Web sites advertising manuscripts for sale,
and scholars paying journals to publish substandard papers.
Now, after years of relative neglect, government officials and
university administrators show signs that they are ready to deal with
the problem.
A few weeks before the scholars released their open letter, Ren Yuling,
a senior official of the State Council, China's cabinet, described to
a group of prominent political delegates a recent government survey of
180 Ph.D. holders, in which 60 percent said they had paid to have
their work published in academic journals. A similar percentage
admitted having copied the work of other scholars. Mr. Ren told the
group that endemic academic corruption was eroding public trust in
academe.
Also in March, the Ministry of Education announced that it was
establishing a committee to monitor academic corruption and to set up
guidelines for the punishment of offenders. Soon after that, the
Ministry of Science and Technology said it would create a database to
keep a permanent record of violations.
Exposing Corruption
In the absence of government monitoring of plagiarism, online
watchdogs have filled the void. Academic Criticism, one of the first
Chinese-language Web sites dedicated to exposing and fighting
corruption, is filled with postings by Chinese scholars concerned that
rampant cheating undermines the development of academic and scientific
research in their country. Many other scholars, including graduate
students, have turned plagiarism-spotting into a hobby.
Mr. Fang, who uses the pen name Fang Zhouzi, is one of the
better-known spotters among them. He says universities often drag
their feet or take no action until someone has been exposed. The
biologist, who was trained at Michigan State University, says his Web
site carries daily reports of scientific misconduct, many of which are
provided by leading scholars. He asserts that he has uncovered close
to 500 cases of "scientific misconduct" over the past four years, but
that most of them have been ignored by both the universities and the
government. His Web site, http://www.xys.org, is blocked within China
by the government, but mirror sites can be accessed there.
Liu Hui's dismissal from Tsinghua was "an exception," declares Mr. Fang,
who says sources inside the university told him that administrators
had been reluctant to take action after the assistant dean's
plagiarism became known and did so only after colleagues had put
pressure on them. Mr. Liu was fired four months after Mr. Fang first
publicized the accusations on his Web site. By contrast, Mr. Fang says,
an associate professor in Tsinghua's biology department listed seven
nonexistent papers on his vita. He was not punished, says Mr. Fang,
and was later promoted to full professor.
"Even when a case is exposed, the university will usually try to cover
it up ― particularly when the accused is a big shot ― to protect the
fame and gain of the university," says Mr. Fang. "Members of the
Chinese Academy of Sciences are very powerful. They can bring a lot of
funding for their universities, and therefore it's in the university's
interest to protect them." Mr. Fang says his Web site has exposed
about 20 members of the academy for plagiarism or misconduct. "None of
them have been officially investigated or punished," he says.
He is pleased that the government has finally acknowledged that
something needs to be done, and that the news media are more willing
than before to report such cases. But he is not confident of success.
Academic corruption is both a social and political problem, Mr. Fang
notes, which means that China must undertake radical reforms in order
to eliminate it. A democratic government, independent scientific and
educational institutions, and a free press are all necessary, he says,
to foster a climate of intellectual honesty.
History of Cheating
Scholarship in China, like that in many other countries, has a long
history of cheating. During the Qing dynasty (1644-1911) scholars
taking the rigorous imperial exam, to win coveted positions in the
civil service, resorted to all sorts of tricks, including smuggling in
miniature books and cheat sheets the size of a fingernail. At
Beijing's old Imperial Academy, an exhibit on cheating once displayed
the undershirt of one cheater covered in Chinese characters.
In 1964, Chairman Mao Zedong actually endorsed cheating during a
speech in which he criticized the staid education system and its
emphasis on exams. "At examinations whispering into each other's ears
and taking other people's places ought to be allowed. If your answer
is good and I copy it, then mine should be counted as good," he
declared.
In recent years, Chinese students have resorted to the use of qiangshou,
or "hired guns," to take many exams. Their services can be retained
for just about any test in China, including the Test of English as a
Foreign Language, the International English Language Testing System,
and the Graduate Record Examination. One now-defunct Web site offered
three options: a hired gun for 2,000 yuan (currently about $250),
answers in advance for 4,000 yuan, or answers provided during the test
for 1,200 yuan via a wireless device described as an imported
"satellite receiver" no bigger than a thumbnail.
Chinese schools have not traditionally taught students to avoid
plagiarism. High-school students, who spend much of their time
memorizing, are not required to produce papers that require research.
And once in college, they get little or no training in how to write a
research paper.
Some professors even encourage students to engage in a sort of benign
form of plagiarism. "Our teacher told us to copy," says a recent
graduate of the Beijing University of Applied Technology, whose senior
thesis contained some word-for-word plagiarism. "She said we don't
know enough to express our own ideas."
Many academics worry that the government's recent push to create
dozens of world-class universities is fueling a plagiarism epidemic.
In China both graduate students and professors are required to publish
several papers each year in what are known as "key journals." Critics
of the government's reforms note that decisions about faculty members'
salaries, promotions, and benefits are tied to publication in these
journals rather than to the papers' actual content, a reality that
leads to fast and dirty research. Some academics publish as many as a
dozen papers a year.
In its article on academic corruption, China Newsweek noted that
increasing pressure to publish has spawned an academic black market,
in which professors pay to have their papers published in counterfeit
journals. According to the magazine's calculations, China's recognized
journals are capable of publishing 300,000 articles annually, while
this year the country's academics are expected to produce some 530,000
papers.
In a newspaper opinion piece, one academic wrote that the unrealistic
expectations were reminiscent of China's Great Leap Forward of the
late 1950s, when Chairman Mao called for a sharp rise in industrial
production. The effort, which instead resulted in shoddy output, was a
disaster.
"You can't have a campaign to increase the number of papers so a
person can keep his position," says Tang Anguo, head of the Institute
of Higher Education at East China Normal University, in Shanghai. "If
you do this, the pressure on scholars will be too strong."
"ressure can sometimes make you a better person," notes Mr. Tang.
"But if there's too much, it can also break you."
RECENT ALLEGATIONS OF ACADEMIC FRAUD IN CHINA
Yang Jie, dean, School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji
University. Demoted in April as director of the school for falsifying
details on his résumé, but kept on as a professor.
Liu Hui, assistant dean of the medical school, Tsinghua University.
Was fired in March after it was discovered that he had taken credit
for an academic paper he had not written and had lied on his résumé
about working at New York University Medical Center.
Shen Luwei, associate professor of Chinese, Tianjin Foreign Studies
University. Fired in January for plagiarizing 10 articles in a book.
Hu Xingrong, journalism professor, Shantou University. Resigned in
2005 after being found to have plagiarized an article he had published
in a Hong Kong journal.
Zhou Yezhong, law professor, Wuhan University. Accused in 2005 of
copying the work of another scholar, Wang Tiancheng, without
attribution. Mr. Wang's lawsuit against him is pending. The university
has not taken any action.
Qiu Xiaoqing, professor of biomedicine, Sichuan University. Accused in
2005 by an anticorruption Web site of publishing fake research in the
November 2003 issue of the journal Nature Biotechnology. The
university is investigating.
Huang Zongying, English professor, Peking University. Fired in 2004
for plagiarizing two-thirds of a book on T.S. Eliot by a British
scholar.
Wang Mingming, anthropology professor, Peking University. In 2002 a
doctoral student accused him of plagiarizing parts of William A.
Haviland's book Cultural Anthropology. The university subsequently
removed Mr. Wang from most of his academic posts.
ressure can sometimes make you a better person," notes Mr. Tang.