倍可親

標題: How many sex partners have you had so far (you can vote anonymously) [列印本頁]

作者: 湯姆大叔 時間: 2010-7-22 05:03
標題: How many sex partners have you had so far (you can vote anonymously)

作者: Lawler 時間: 2010-7-22 14:28
大叔呀，這。。。這也太隱私了。

作者: xoyuanfen 時間: 2010-7-23 00:25
嘻嘻

作者: TCM 時間: 2010-7-23 00:31

哈

作者: 湯姆大叔 時間: 2010-7-23 01:22

TCM: 哈

just want to run a survey.

It looks like it distributes heavily to the two ends.

作者: marnifan 時間: 2010-7-23 06:37
老土了，只有一個

作者: 湯姆大叔 時間: 2010-7-23 22:39

Lawler: 大叔呀，這。。。這也太隱私了。

I suggested &quot;anonymously&quot;.

作者: 湯姆大叔 時間: 2010-7-23 22:46

marnifan: 老土了，只有一個

well, you can see that most people participated picked 1. I believe this is time related. For those of us born in 50, 60,and 70s, this is typical as somehow we had this concept that once you had sex with someone, you were very likely to get married with that person. Not always true, but is a general perception. I assume that most poeple picked more than 4 are much younger (80s?). the culture is changing with time.

作者: Lawler 時間: 2010-7-23 23:14

湯姆大叔: I suggested &quot;anonymously&quot;.

大叔呀，這sex partner如何定義？同時的？不定期的？常規的？一夜的，一定不會算吧。。。呵呵

作者: 湯姆大叔 時間: 2010-7-23 23:28

Lawler: 大叔呀，這sex partner如何定義？同時的？不定期的？常規的？一夜的，一定不會算吧。。。呵呵

all of these. I assume as long as you had sex with a person that person is your sex partner. frequency is irrelavent. Hoep you are not going to ask me about the definition of &quot;having sex&quot;.

I am not as good as Bill.

作者: Lawler 時間: 2010-7-24 00:09

湯姆大叔: all of these. I assume as long as you had sex with a person that person is your sex partner. frequency is irrelavent. Hoep you are not going to ask

明白了。問題這樣問：你曾經與多少個不同的人發生過性關係？
對了，大叔，如何定義「性關係」呀？哈哈

作者: 湯姆大叔 時間: 2010-7-24 00:51

Lawler: 明白了。問題這樣問：你曾經與多少個不同的人發生過性關係？
對了，大叔，如何定義「性關係」呀？哈哈

作者: marnifan 時間: 2010-7-24 06:59

Lawler: 大叔呀，這sex partner如何定義？同時的？不定期的？常規的？一夜的，一定不會算吧。。。呵呵

搗亂呀

作者: marnifan 時間: 2010-7-24 07:00

湯姆大叔: well, you can see that most people participated picked 1. I believe this is time related. For those of us born in 50, 60,and 70s, this is typical as

所以是又老又土了

作者: Lawler 時間: 2010-7-24 22:28

marnifan: 搗亂呀

誠意請教。麻妮，不可亂說。。。呵呵

歡迎光臨倍可親 (https://big5.backchina.com/)