單反實在是太重,有些場合,帶單反無法參與活動,想買一個小的3/4相機,希望成像效果好,一直在糾結,到底是松下gf-1呢,還是奧林巴斯ep-2,似乎松下的餅乾頭很不錯,可惜單賣要400刀,各位有什麼建議?作者: 酒余飯後 時間: 2010-6-24 05:03
建議去google一下4/3論壇,應該會有很多評判。作者: jianti 時間: 2010-6-24 05:35
謝謝酒余飯後,看了半天,越看越迷惑,又覺得epl-1不錯了,性價比高作者: NikonForFun 時間: 2010-6-24 05:58
Actually I have been confused since first so called 4/3 camera hit the market. Why 4/3 system? For advanced amateurs or professionals, 4/3's photo quality can not compete with APS-C or full frame. For Johns or Janes 4/3s are too expensive and too big with smaller zoom. 4/3 system has interchangeable lenses. But when considering a small body with big and heavy lens case, I wonder this system would succeed in market. Whom this 4/3 system are marketing for?作者: peachnestea 時間: 2010-6-24 06:45
4/3的相機一般用也不是太差,http://www.flickriver.com/groups/dmc-gf1/pool/interesting/
最主要的原因在於leica太貴,單反太沉,沒有可以承受的全副旁軸,所以4/3當道。有點兒像當年APS-C一樣,蓋因當時的全副DSLR太貴。作者: bm168 時間: 2010-6-24 07:09
SONY NEX5作者: Sunnygirl08 時間: 2010-6-24 10:56
我也覺得單反太重了,所以在等Panasonic...GF-2+餅乾鏡頭.
第二代會比較完善一點...作者: Blue Ivy 時間: 2010-6-24 20:54 本帖最後由 Blue Ivy 於 2010-6-24 20:55 編輯