Actually I have been confused since first so called 4/3 camera hit the market. Why 4/3 system? For advanced amateurs or professionals, 4/3's photo quality can not compete with APS-C or full frame. For Johns or Janes 4/3s are too expensive and too big with smaller zoom. 4/3 system has interchangeable lenses. But when considering a small body with big and heavy lens case, I wonder this system would succeed in market. Whom this 4/3 system are marketing for?
You know me if you knew me. You are not required to know me if you did not know me.
3/4 or 43??43系統焦段*2,canon的APS*1.6,全幅不變,比如說50mm的標頭用到43系統上成了100mm可視角的中長焦了。。畫質方面比APS系統或全幅一定會差一點,因為感測器面積小,勝在便攜性。。。一些老的電影頭因為像場小點都可以改口用到43系統上,這算是優勢吧。。。現在sony也開始出小機器了,也就是168版主講的NEX5,再加上聽說佳能也有開發全幅數碼旁軸的計劃了,43系統的前途難說。。。一定要選松下的話,在gf1和gh1間我可能會選擇gh1。。。。呵呵,記得一位前輩說過攝影器材好玩的不好用,好用的不好玩還是蠻有道理的。。。