大學要與企業合作開拓發展空間， 而不是從校友那兒募捐

大學要與企業合作開拓發展空間， 而不是從校友那兒募捐  Universities should work with companies  for development space, rather than fund-raising from alumni

中國沒有美國這樣長的資本主義史，而且也不是美國這樣子的制度，可以讓畢業生畢業以後自行尋找創意投資, 在自由市場上滾爬跌打，可以僅憑一個專利，或小小社交軟體，打遍天下！可以雪球般滾到幾百億的身價的！美國這邊每個城市都有專門教別人怎麼去開創一個小企業, 啟動基金不用很多的，並且有政府資金資助或法律幫助的，有時還專門是針對政府項目投標的. 這些講座有些還是免費的. 但是中國大學里從來不教這些，要讓一個中國高校畢業生自己去找這些項目, 把資金, 人力, 物力全都綜合起來，風風火火辦一番大事, 不是件容易的事！中國大學不應該象國外大學那樣，只看見校友的口袋！如果中國大學尋找募捐的話，大學畢業生的超級成功率應該不大，而且中國也沒有募捐的習慣. 募捐應該向成功的企業去找，向在某些跟學校專業相關的領域中, 做得出類拔萃的企業去募，因為學校是要向這些企業輸送人才的. 就像我以前的大學USC，國防大公司休斯公司就專門捐款建了一幢大樓，因為國防工業需要USC的教授和學生做研究.

China does not have such a long history of capitalism as the United States, and it is not a system like the United States which allows graduates to find their own creative investment after graduation, and to dance in the free market, with only one patent, or small social software, hit the world! Even can be snowballed to the value of tens of billions! Every city in the United States has a special education organization to teach others how to create a small business. The start-up fund does not need a lot of money, and there are government funds or legal assistance, and sometimes it is specifically for government projects. These lectures are still free. However, Chinese universities have never taught this. It is not easy for a Chinese college graduate to find these projects and integrate all the funds, manpower and material resources. It is not easy to do something big! Chinese universities should not only see the alumna』s pockets as foreign universities do! If Chinese universities are looking for fund-raising, the super success rate of college graduates should be small, and there is no habit of fund-raising in China. Fund-raising should be sought from successful companies, and in the fields related to school majors, The company is going to raise funds because the school is going to send talents to these companies. Just like my former university USC, the big defense company Hughes has donated a building t because the defense industry needs USC professors and students to do research.
其實對一個學校來說，要辦成一流大學，一方面在於外界的捐款，可以將資金用於設立新的教學設施等，但更重要的, 我覺得，對大多數學生來說，可以得益的，是他們畢業以後，能夠找到對口的有前途的工作機會，施展他們所學和才華！所以大學應該根據自己的專業，去找相關的研究單位和工業廠家，同時緊密地和他們相聯繫，不斷要求他們提供學生實習給機會，積極地與他們一起做科研項目，同時也可以參與他們的投資辦企業，為他們提供技術諮詢或者人才輸送，同時分享他們的利潤. 你看這樣子，學校培養的人才就有很多專業對口的職業機會在等待著他們，同時學校又從中可以獲得利潤. 在此同時，因為學校和在不同領域, 不同行業的很多家的公司, 企業有直接的聯繫，如果有什麼跨行業的合作, 或者是新產品的創意設計，學校就可以馬上得心應手調遣資源加以整合，把學校作為一種高層次的人才, 智能, 資源的提供者，是不是遠遠勝於只是從校友們那兒獲得捐款？

In fact, for a school, to be a top-ranking university, on  one hand, it is big donation from  outside world,  used to set up new teaching facilities. But more importantly, I think that for most students, can benefit is after they graduate, they can find a promising job opportunity and show what they have learned and their talents! Therefore, universities should find relevant research units and industrial manufacturers according to their own professions, and at the same time closely contact them, and constantly ask them to provide students with internship opportunities, actively carry out research projects with them, and also participate in their projects. Invest in companies, provide them with technical advice or talent transfer, and share their profits. You see, there are many professional career opportunities for the students who are training in the school, waiting for them, and the school can get profits from it. At the same time, because the school has direct contact with many companies in different fields and industries, if there is any cross-industry cooperation or creative design of new products, the school can immediately deploy resources to integrate. Is school as a high-level talent, intelligence, resource provider, is it better than just getting donations from alumni?

有些行業是新興的，有些行業是低調的，有些行業需要長時間的介入，眼光不能只在成功的校友身上，應該尋找學校跟專業有關的行業里的校友. 年輕的校友有幹勁，是行業里的先鋒，但年老的校友更有經驗，見多識廣. 大學應該有sense, 如果只盯著捐款，再加勢利眼的話，能不能辦成一流大學，我不知道！ 但可以辦成一流的出風頭大學！ 美國的大學，象哈佛這樣的綜合大學不多，有些非一流的大學，卻有一流的系科. 那些系排名甚至超過哈佛斯坦福！中國父母只看重學校的名聲，很多學生爬藤進重點大學不怎麼樣的科系，其實倒不如去二三流大學超一流的科系. 那些超一流的科系，很多是因為他們跟附近的大企業有直接的聯繫，這就為學生提供實在的學習機會和職業道路！ 所以辦一流大學，更應該著重於, 和自己相關科系有關的行業中的企業建立聯繫！反過來，是不是國家應該讓那些行業，有可能的話, 都提供實習和與教育界聯繫的管道. 當教育系統的網和行業的網相重疊的時候，這樣的吸引力是可以把全球人才都一網打盡的. 用對人才，你才會發展，才能保持發展！我覺得印度人現在在做全球網羅人才這件事，而中國人還盯著捐款和少數精英.

Some industries are new, some are low-key, and some industries require long-term involvement. The vision is not only for successful alumni, but also for alumni in the industry-related fields. Young alumni are motivated and in the industry. The pioneer, but the old alumni are more experienced and knowledgeable. The university should have a sense. If you only stare at the donation and add snobbery, how can you become a first-class university? I don't know! But you can make a first-class showoff university! There are not many universities in the United States, such as Harvard. Some non-premium universities have first-class departments. Those ranks even exceed Harvard Stanford! Chinese parents only value the reputation of the school. Many students climb the ivy into the major departments of the key universities. In fact, it is better to go to the second-class universities. Those super-class departments are mostly because they are close to the big companies nearby. There is a direct connection, which provides students with real learning opportunities and career paths! Therefore, to run a first-class university, you should focus on establishing contacts with companies in the industries related to your  departments! Conversely, is it that the state should allow those industries, if possible, to provide internships and links to the education community? When the network of education systems overlaps with the industry's network, such an attraction can bring global talents to you. With talent, you will develop and keep developing! I think Indians are setting up network for global talents now, while Chinese are still staring at donations and a few elites.