倍可親

法官來到我們班- 溫哥華高中(14)

作者:卉櫻果  於 2011-12-11 04:31 發表於 最熱鬧的華人社交網路--貝殼村

作者分類:讀書生涯|通用分類:法律相關|已有46評論

關鍵詞:, , 政府部門, 司法部長, 委員會

二008年三月二十六日下午,省高級法院的本尼特法官先生來到我們班講解加拿大的「司法獨立」,然後回答學生的問題。

本尼特法官先生說,加拿大法律是從幾方面保障司法獨立的體制:確保法官的收入,確保法官的職位,確保法官不涉及他/她所熟悉的環境人物之案件。最後一點也是最重要的,確保司法與立法、執法、和政府部門的分開。

能夠成為一個法官,就意味著進入了高收入一族。本尼特法官先生自報年收入為二十五萬兩千,再加上五千加元的書報費。這個數字那與加拿大2006年 家庭平均收入六萬五加元的比較,那不是一般的可觀。給與法官高薪的原 因,據說是為了避免他們受賄,另一方面也是對他們十年寒窗苦讀和長期辛勤工作的回報。想象一下我們國內法官的收入,甚至少於國內外企銷售員,那就無語了。

另一個保障司法獨立的政策就是法官的職位是終身制的。法官的任命程序是這樣的,有一個獨立的委員會根據律師或者司法工作人員的優秀品德給出一個名單。名單中的候選人年齡,女性在三十歲以上,男性在四十歲以上,相信比較成熟的年齡也就比較能獨立思考不受干擾的能力。然後省首席檢察官從名單中選任省法院的法官, 聯邦司法部長或者總理從名單中選任聯邦法院或省高級法院的法官。一旦被任命為法官,省法院工作的七十歲才退休,省高級法院和聯邦法院的到七十五歲。這樣, 因為他們的位置是穩固的,法官在法庭上將無畏地做出判決。

還有,法官必須迴避任何他/她所熟悉的環境(社區)和人物所牽連的案件。這是一條紀律,如果法官認為自己無法作出中間公正的判決,他們必須退出審理。另外,在加拿大,法官不得參與任何政黨(這和美國不一樣),這樣也就預防了政治傾向影響法官的公正判決。

在加拿大,最重要的政策是司法、執法、立法是完全分開的。執法是內閣和公務人員,稱為服務員(servants), 不是領導也不是上司。立法人員是被選出來的法律制定者,司法是在法院工作的人員。司法部門與另外兩個毫無關聯,完全獨立;這樣,就保證了司法的基本原則。 雖然不少國家標榜自己也是三角鼎力的制度,可是真正做到就比較困難。因為這樣的話,每個人(包括國家主席總統總理)在法律面前和條款下真正的平等了。

本尼特法官先生說完後,班級里每個學生開始提問。我問了兩個問題,可是沒有一個答案是令人滿意的。

第一個問題是:加拿大政策如何能保證法官生涯中一直保持他們的美德?如果他們犯了錯誤如何處置。本尼特法官先生的答覆僅僅限於身體健康方面:他說如果發生法官在開庭時打瞌睡或者思想不集中或者由於生病缺席,那麼他可病假六個月或者提前退休。

然而,我們的教科書上的信息是,如果法官有誤判,原告可以與律師、法律援助或者社區法律處聯繫,決定是否要想對此位法官的判決提出上訴。另外,如果有一方不滿意法官的操作行為,可以與法院人員核實法官的工作地點,決定到底是向加拿大司法委員會還是省法院提出投訴。

我第二個問題是本尼特法官先生是否曾經有拒絕接納由警察或者檢察官用不當手段獲得的證據。法官先生說有的,但是他舉例僅僅是「聽說」的證據不能採納,還有情侶或者夫妻的一方證據不能採納。看來他很迴避提及警察或者檢察官負面的行為。

除了上述兩條,總的來說,這位法官先生的講課對於學生總結和理解司法獨立這個概念很有幫助。司法獨立時區別社會和國家是民主體制還是專制體制。我尊重司法獨立,而且我認為,真正做到比自詡更為艱難。

原文是作業:

Report of Judge』s Visit on 26 March 2008

On 26th March, Mr. Justice Burnyeat, a judge from Provincial Supreme Court gave our class a lecture of Judicial Independence in Canada, after that he answered students question.

Mr. Justice Burnyeat says the system of Canada ensures Judicial Independence by the following ways: Security of salary for Judges, security position of Judges, security of separation between Judges and his/her familiar environment of cases. And the last and most important policy is that Judiciary is independent of the executive, legislature and government.

Being a judge, which means he/she can have high salary. Mr. Justice Burnyeat gave his own example that his annual income is around 252,000 CAD, plus 5000 CAD of stationery fee. Comparing to the average income – 65,000 CAD – this job is very good paid.  The reasons to let Judges make much higher salary are preventing them from bribery, and the reward to their longer terms study and hard work. This is very important and great policy. I have known some Judges were not impartial in China because they were lured by palm grease. Just imagine that the income for a judge in China is much less than a sales people in the foreigner-owned company in China.

Security position of Judges is one of the issues to protect independence of the judiciary. Mr. Justice Burnyeat says that Judges are selected by committee based on their merits, and appointed by attorney general (for Provincial) or federal minister of justice or Prime minister. Once Judges appointed, it is a life term career until reach 75 (appointed by Federal) or 70 (appointed by Provincial). In this case, Judge will not have any fear to make decision in the court because their positions are not easily moved. Another regulation is that only those reach a certain age will be selected as Judge, for woman, it will be above 30, and for man will be above 40. People believe that a mature person will be more difficult to be influenced by other people』s opinion or worldview.

Moreover, Judges must be separated from the cases that any one involved in the case that Judges are familiar with. This is like a discipline, Judges must withdraw the cases if they thinks that they are not capable to be impartial. On the other hand, in Canada, any politician or party member is not allowed to be a judge, which prevents one from influence of any political orientation.

The most significant policy in Canada is that three branches of government are completely separated. The executive are the cabinet and civil servants (not bosses!!!), the legislature are the elected law makers, and the judiciary are the people work in  the courts. The Judiciary is independent of the other two; therefor, it ensures the principle of fundamental justice. It is very hard to do so than to claim so. Then every one is equal in front of or under law no matter how high the person』s position is.

After the speech give by Mr. Justice Burnyeat, students became to raise questions. I asked Mr. Justice Burnyeat two question; however, none of the answers satisfied me.

My first question is how can judges keep their merits all their business life; and what will be done if they made mistakes. Mr. Justice Burnyeat』s reply it from the physical side only. He says in case a judge falling asleep during court, or does not think clearly, or absent due to healthy problem, he/she can ask sick leave or early retire.

Never the less, from the handout information and our law 12 class, we know that if a judge made a decision with mistake in the courts, the complainant can contact a lawyer, legal aid office or community legal clinic to determine whether or not they can appeal the decision. Also if the complainant does not satisfied with Judge』s conduct, he/she can check with court staff where the judges sits, to determine whether to bring the compliant to the Canada Judicial Council or to provincial officials.

My another question was that if Mr. Justice Burnyeat had ever excluded evidence because it was obtained by improper way. Mr. Justice Burnyeat said yes, but his examples were not related with 「improper」 way. He said hearsay could not be used as evidence, what you tell your sponsor can not be used in the court. He seems avoid telling any negative examples that police or Crown would possibly do.

Apart from the issues listed above, Mr. Justice Burnyeat』s visit, anyway, helps us student to summarize and understanding the terms of Judicial Independence in Canada. The Judicial Independence is a keystone to distinguish systems of a democracy country or a dictatorship country. I respect the Judicial Independence from the bottom of my heart, because I was come from China. I wish it can be executed all the countries so that bring the democracy to the whole world.


高興

感動

同情

搞笑

難過

拍磚

支持
26

鮮花

剛表態過的朋友 (26 人)

發表評論 評論 (46 個評論)

回復 fanlaifuqu 2011-12-11 04:47
有很多要學的地方!
回復 卉櫻果 2011-12-11 04:49
fanlaifuqu: 有很多要學的地方!
對某些國家來說,制度不變,很難學
回復 wcat 2011-12-11 04:49
美國有的法官是任命的,有的(不記得是哪種)是選的。法官高薪,但有的也照樣犯法。
回復 卉櫻果 2011-12-11 04:50
fanlaifuqu: 有很多要學的地方!
你到底說是誰要學呀?
回復 卉櫻果 2011-12-11 04:57
wcat: 美國有的法官是任命的,有的(不記得是哪種)是選的。法官高薪,但有的也照樣犯法。
概率要小一些吧
回復 wcat 2011-12-11 04:59
卉櫻果: 概率要小一些吧
這可能。現在中國社會,唉
回復 人間的盒子 2011-12-11 05:19
中國的法制就是缺少這種公正獨立,但也不是件容易解決的事情,很多相應的東西也不健全。
回復 fanlaifuqu 2011-12-11 05:20
卉櫻果: 你到底說是誰要學呀?
象我們的祖國呀!
回復 mosville 2011-12-11 05:26
聯邦法官是經過總統任命,國會批准,終身制;但是年薪沒有加拿大的高,所以不少法官過幾年辭職,去做律師和合伙人。
回復 專治蛋疼2 2011-12-11 06:56
不要奢望我天朝朝廷會自己放棄一部分權力,我襠是靠槍杆子奪取政權的,同理要它放棄一點也要靠同樣的方式方法。這就是維穩費高居不下的根本理由。
回復 活水湧泉 2011-12-11 06:57
你寫得真實,有說服力。
回復 putongren10 2011-12-11 07:24
過去,中國的居委會也不錯
回復 無為村姑 2011-12-11 08:36
法官真有權。可我們加拿大有的法官太獨斷啦,對罪犯太有容忍度啦~~~
回復 卉櫻果 2011-12-11 09:51
人間的盒子: 中國的法制就是缺少這種公正獨立,但也不是件容易解決的事情,很多相應的東西也不健全。
如果中國法制公正獨立,那就有救了
回復 卉櫻果 2011-12-11 09:51
fanlaifuqu: 象我們的祖國呀!
那麼我的理解正確
回復 卉櫻果 2011-12-11 09:52
mosville: 聯邦法官是經過總統任命,國會批准,終身制;但是年薪沒有加拿大的高,所以不少法官過幾年辭職,去做律師和合伙人。
不錯的生意哦,因為了解法官的思路
回復 dwqdaniel 2011-12-11 09:55
無為村姑: 法官真有權。可我們加拿大有的法官太獨斷啦,對罪犯太有容忍度啦~~~
同感,這裡的法官簡直寬容到混蛋地步,所謂「寧可錯放一千,絕不冤枉一個」,多倫多有個叫唐偉真的騙子,非法集資了幾千萬,被人告發,法官大人仁慈開恩,一次又一次給他機會辯解,至今還神氣活現地逍遙著,去年還競選多倫多市長,這事要是放在國內,大刑伺候,早被砍頭了,呵呵。
回復 卉櫻果 2011-12-11 09:56
專治蛋疼2: 不要奢望我天朝朝廷會自己放棄一部分權力,我襠是靠槍杆子奪取政權的,同理要它放棄一點也要靠同樣的方式方法。這就是維穩費高居不下的根本理由。
一點也不奢望。不過黨的新華報解放前寫的「一黨專制」蠻諷刺的,列出的就是他們現在的行徑。
回復 卉櫻果 2011-12-11 09:56
活水湧泉: 你寫得真實,有說服力。
偶上課記筆記很認真滴~
回復 卉櫻果 2011-12-11 09:58
putongren10: 過去,中國的居委會也不錯
50~80年代初還是為人民服務的,記得有大鍊鋼鐵,薰蚊子臭蟲,發冰塊,地板蠟,等等
123下一頁

facelist doodle 塗鴉板

您需要登錄后才可以評論 登錄 | 註冊

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2024-3-29 19:04

返回頂部